From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 23:44:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC2116A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:44:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neo.samodelkin.net (samodelkin.net [81.176.202.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E58E43D2D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:44:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fjoe@neo.samodelkin.net) Received: by neo.samodelkin.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 022E11706A; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:44:40 +0700 (NOVST) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:44:40 +0700 From: Max Khon To: gnome@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040627234440.GB73609@samodelkin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Subject: threads in ports/textproc/libxml2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:44:45 -0000 Hi! Are there any outstanding reasons for building ports/textproc/libxml2 without threads support by default? /fjoe