From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 15 21:25:08 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6911065672;
	Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:25:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F938FC13;
	Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:25:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgbds13 with SMTP id ds13so1782058wgb.1
	for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:25:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=01rUC02AA1IBImtEMcYSDqr1FhgQzKU+JGgR5l659IE=;
	b=mPbuaR7qYL9qQqflmhEG/FOaQEfmuj02b98bHd+SanqMl7dERFG5KaTYVMQkAfsKKC
	e9OvIZ9LOWmPEN83dZkwSRZvOCAyuriuV1wOtiGP0CSMe4UoPSY9hhbEcSBUuUaCQu5O
	0RbaaZ6XLpaZFEyiHTZGLh6JB77EHRvg/zljI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.95.136 with SMTP id dk8mr3940463wib.11.1323984306922; Thu,
	15 Dec 2011 13:25:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.158.129 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:25:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADLo83-28ZSaazXzk2st-BZ9rNA1fsryS38fpwRZF_dyq2sxBw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com>
	<CAJ-FndDniGH8QoT=kUxOQ+zdVhWF0Z0NKLU0PGS-Gt=BK6noWw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EE2AE64.9060802@m5p.com> <4EE88343.2050302@m5p.com>
	<CAFHbX1+5PttyZuNnYot8emTn_AWkABdJCvnpo5rcRxVXj0ypJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EE933C6.4020209@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<CAPjTQNEJDE17TLH-mDrG_-_Qa9R5N3mSeXSYYWtqz_DFidzYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111215024249.GA13557@icarus.home.lan>
	<4EE9A2A0.80607@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<op.v6iv3qe5g7njmm@michael-think> <4EE9C79B.7080607@phoronix.com>
	<4EE9F546.6060503@freebsd.org>
	<E76CA6AF-4109-4627-AF9B-D1C7C4C6D4E2@digsys.bg>
	<4EEA3556.7030105@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<CADLo83-28ZSaazXzk2st-BZ9rNA1fsryS38fpwRZF_dyq2sxBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:25:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CAN6yY1tamVb4XeokR1EHhduFjxNfugrSHhZ8p1YY2WGs9mi9ww@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com>
To: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Michael Larabel <michael.larabel@phoronix.com>,
	FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>,
	Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
	Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg>, Michael Ross <gmx@ross.cx>,
	freebsd-performance@freebsd.org,
	"O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>,
	Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com>
Subject: Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1
	Server
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:25:09 -0000

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 15 December 2011 17:58, O. Hartmann <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>> Since ZFS in Linux can only be achieved via FUSE (ad far as I know), it
>> is legitimate to compare ZFS and ext4. It would be much more competetive
>> to compare Linux BTRFS and FreeBSD ZFS.
>>
>
>
> Er... does ext4 guarantee data integrity?
>
> You're not comparing like with like; please do some research on the
> point of ZFS before asserting that they're fair comparisons.
>
> A fair(er) comparison could be ext4 with UFS+soft-updates.

Wouldn't UFS+SUJ be the closest atch?
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com