From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 15 12:12:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9775516A4CE for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:12:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [66.11.174.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D8243D5C for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:12:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (wocker.unixathome.org [192.168.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0ED13D42; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:12:44 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dan Langille" To: Ulrich Spoerlein Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:12:44 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <425F777C.28579.75F5401@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20050415090909.GB778@galgenberg.net> References: <425B8BED.14391.1C552FBC@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Florent Thoumie Subject: Re: Ports version upping policy? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:12:45 -0000 On 15 Apr 2005 at 11:09, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > On Tue, 12.04.2005 at 08:50:53 -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > > > Actually, that's what people do when using the link next to > > > "Maintained by". I'm not sure how to explain this clearly with > > > few words. Maybe "Maintained by: ports@FreeBSD.org > > > (freebsd-ports@ mailing list)". > > > > Have a look at http://beta.freshports.org/archivers/9e/ for an > > example. > > That's nice. But what I would like to see is an icon for the mainpage > where all recent commits are shown. That way, when Kris goes into > broken-spree next time, one can easily guess if the port is maintained > (and will be fixed by the maintainer) or if it is unmaintained and one > should probably submit a PR oneself. > > Right now, we have: > > [Time Committer] Link-to-Commit-Message > name version category another-link {broken|restricted|vulnerable|...} descr > > How about adding a red 'U' to that list (similar to 'R' in restricted) > if maintainer == ports@freebsd.org ? That's easy enough to add. If someone finds me a really nice U, I'll add it in. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference - http://www.bsdcan.org/ NEW brochure available at http://www.bsdcan.org/2005/advocacy/