From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Jan 23 04:16:44 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA08474
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 04:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA08467
          for <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 04:16:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.shockwave.com (localhost.shockwave.com [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA00500; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 04:01:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199601231201.EAA00500@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: WARNING: proposed change to samba port 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 23 Jan 1996 09:54:53 +0100."
             <199601230854.JAA02534@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1996 04:01:33 -0800
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk


  From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
  Subject: Re: WARNING: proposed change to samba port
  
  I'm all for it!

OK, most folks are for it, one objection.  I said I wouldn't do it if there
were any objections, however, to split a fine hair, I could always give you
the patch file and you could apply it. :-)

It would be best to gather rough consensus among the users first.
Feel free to twist arms.

Paul