From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 15 21:33:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8929115105 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 21:33:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA37329; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 22:32:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA27186; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 22:32:55 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199908160432.WAA27186@harmony.village.org> To: Mike Smith Subject: Re: Q: Extending the sysctl MIB for Linuxulator variables Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 15 Aug 1999 10:24:30 PDT." <199908151724.KAA13658@dingo.cdrom.com> References: <199908151724.KAA13658@dingo.cdrom.com> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1999 22:32:55 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <199908151724.KAA13658@dingo.cdrom.com> Mike Smith writes: : We're staying away from the term "emulation" because it's being : associated with things like the abominable 'lxrun' and virtual-machine : emulators like VMware. Also, there is a perception that "emulation" is slower than native, which isn't the case for the Linux ABI in FreeBSD. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message