From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Feb 16 10:14:38 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA20920
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 16 Feb 1996 10:14:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA20913
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 16 Feb 1996 10:14:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA11453; Fri, 16 Feb 1996 11:12:54 -0700
Message-Id: <199602161812.LAA11453@rover.village.org>
To: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Subject: Re: An ISP's Wishlist... 
Cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, muir@idiom.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 16 Feb 1996 10:54:44 CST
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 11:12:54 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

Ah, semantics :-)

You are aboslutely correct that TIA and SLiRP don't have their own
interface.  From a protocol analyser point of view it is rewriting,
but you are correct that there are a lot of limitations in this...

Warner