From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 18:34:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788CF16A4CF; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:34:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D8343D2F; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:34:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.0.35.182] (g35-182.icann.org[192.0.35.182]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20050411183447016008h6j0e>; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:34:48 +0000 Message-ID: <425AC346.1000003@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:34:46 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050326) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Messenger References: <200504110157.j3B1v4ks014061@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/xscreensaver Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/x11/xscreensaver/files patch-ab patch-driver_Makefile.in X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:34:49 -0000 Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Are you sure? The gdk_pixbuf is more for gtk1 app. The GTK2 already has > gdk_pixbuf function included. Several others have pointed this out, thanks. I just removed that dependency. > You should copy some of > xscreensaver-gnome's Makefile like start to use the 'USE_GNOME' > infrastructure. Um, no. I passionately dislike that entire infrastructure, and as xscreensaver is not a gnome app, it's not suitable in any case. And yes, I realize that I'm being a curmudgeon on this, but before you respond and tell me so please check the archives for my reasoning in more detail. Thanks, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection