From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 30 16:30:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E27D546 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006181D86 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r3UGU1cJ079061 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r3UGU1E6079060; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:30:01 GMT Message-Id: <201304301630.r3UGU1E6079060@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Tadaaki Nagao Subject: Re: ports/178250: Fix build failures of japanese/{mozc-server, mozc-tool, ibus-mozc, mozc-el} X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tadaaki Nagao List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:30:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/178250; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tadaaki Nagao To: hrs@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, abtk@shitamachi.org Subject: Re: ports/178250: Fix build failures of japanese/{mozc-server, mozc-tool, ibus-mozc, mozc-el} Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 01:23:08 +0900 (JST) Hi hiroki-san, In "Re: ports/178250: Fix build failures of japanese/{mozc-server, mozc-tool, ibus-mozc, mozc-el}", Hiroki Sato wrote: > Dependency on them should be written in USE_*. And, using > BUILD_DEPENDS for libraries is not correct. When I wrote the patch I previously sent, my intention was to preserve original code as much as possible. As for why they were so written in the first place, please ask the original author... (daichi-san?) But I agree with you that those BUILD_DEPENDS should be got rid of in favor of some other preferable ways. I will look into this, but it will take some time because Mozc's build system looks to me too complicated to understand. In the meanwhile, how about applying my patch as a quick fix for the current breakage, and having refinements later as a second step. Thanks, Tadaaki Nagao