From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jun 20 16:22:27 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA25341 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 16:22:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu (Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.34]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA25336 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 16:22:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA05100; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 18:22:23 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu: jfieber owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 18:22:22 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber X-Sender: jfieber@Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu To: questions@freebsd.org cc: "Andrew N. Edmond" Subject: Re: SIMM stackers? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 20 Jun 1996, Andrew N. Edmond wrote: > Anybody have problems with these SIMM stackers? Closely related, anybody have problems with 30 -> 72 pin converters? I'm pondering a new motherboard (ASUS P55T2P4) and have 32 megabytes of 30 pin SIMMs that I'd sure like to recycle. > I am not too sure of the technology but haven't heard anything good or bad > about them. Running FreeBSD 2.1-stable (may 07th). I've heard some talk about buffered versus unbuffered, but nothing really conclusive. -john == jfieber@indiana.edu =========================================== == http://fallout.campusview.indiana.edu/~jfieber ================