From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Tue May 28 19:13:32 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A450F15A8FE6
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 28 May 2019 19:13:32 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDD68D54F
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 May 2019 19:13:31 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from lowell-desk.be-well.ilk.org (router.lan [172.30.250.2])
 by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED43433C58;
 Tue, 28 May 2019 15:13:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by lowell-desk.be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147)
 id EBF73187EE8; Tue, 28 May 2019 15:13:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To: Serpent7776 <serpent7776@gmail.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,  Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh@kathe.in>
Subject: Re: kernel and most of userland : c : which edition?
References: <58c53e2e6bc1942004bc9f7fac7d6f80@kathe.in>
 <44sgsy8o40.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20190528204823.7e227123@DaemONX>
Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 15:13:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20190528204823.7e227123@DaemONX> (Serpent's message of "Tue, 28
 May 2019 20:48:23 +0200")
Message-ID: <44muj68ka4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DCDD68D54F
X-Spamd-Bar: ++
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.60 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.62)[-0.622,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
 RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.27)[0.268,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ilk.org];
 AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[];
 RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[];
 MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: be-well.ilk.org];
 NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.93)[0.927,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[];
 FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[];
 FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[];
 SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:23.30.0.0/15, country:US];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
 IP_SCORE(0.04)[ip: (0.09), ipnet: 23.30.0.0/15(0.07), asn: 7922(0.10),
 country: US(-0.06)]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 19:13:32 -0000

Serpent7776 <serpent7776@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, 28 May 2019 13:50:39 -0400
> Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote:
>
>> Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh@kathe.in> writes:
>> 
>> > which edition of c is-being/has-been used to write the majority of the
>> > kernel and userland?
>> > illumos people are mandating c99 for all new code and have heard about
>> > them taking the efforts to migrate old code to c99 too.
>> > is there any such movement in coding standards happening in
>> > freebsd-land too?
>> 
>> See "man 7 style" but the basic gist is that c99 is expected for new
>> code and that updating older code to c99 is typical practice when
>> changing that code for other reasons. 
>
> $ man 7 style
> No manual entry for style
>
> Did you mean `man 9 style`?

Yes, I did. In fact, I *should* have just said "man style" because there
isn't any other.