Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:31:16 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [PATCH: libc]Re: gnome on current Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10210300827570.16861-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <3DBFB627.6BD0B926@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > Doug Rabson wrote: > > > > All you have to do is create a situation where a shared object that links > > > > to libc_r is loaded after libX11 and the thing breaks into little pieces. > > > > > > So let's dike out libXThrStub.so, and be done with it. > > > > I think the only stub which it defines that libc.so doesn't also define is > > pthread_cond_broadcast. I'm waiting to see if that lack causes any > > noticeable problems. > > That's bizarre... it's defined in libc_r, so there's no reason for > the omission in libc. I only added stubs that I thought the implementation of libc used (or would use). > Please find attached a patch that corrects this. Patch looks correct. > PS: It looks like the semaphore code use pthread_cond_signal; maybe it > should be using the pthread_cond_broadcast, instead? This seeems to > be broken, if we are talking a large vs. small count on the semaphore... Semaphores only increment/decrement the semaphore by 1. -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10210300827570.16861-100000>