From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Feb 8 18:07:31 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA14064 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 18:07:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.HiWAAY.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA14058 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 18:07:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (tnt1-208-147-147-229.dialup.HiWAAY.net [208.147.147.229]) by mail.HiWAAY.net (8.9.1a/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA20258; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 20:07:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.hiwaay.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA98919; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 20:07:19 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Message-Id: <199902090207.UAA98919@nospam.hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Kevin T. Likes" cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: David Kelly Subject: Re: exmh 2.0.2 and wish8.0 eating memory on 3.0 In-reply-to: Message from "Kevin T. Likes" of "Mon, 08 Feb 1999 15:27:57 EST." <199902082027.PAA01803@jaka.isd.state.in.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 20:07:15 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Kevin T. Likes" writes: > > I'm running exmh on a 3.0-Stable system, installed from binaries. I've > reinstalled exmh 2.0.2 and tcl and tk 8.0.4 since the upgrade, which I > believe were the same versions running on the box before I upgraded. Since you mention it, just looked at what wish8.0 was doing on my system right now with exmh (3.0-stable, mostly elf). Eek! 10952k RES and SIZE of 11528k according to top. Going to have to break down and print the mutt manual and learn something new. Maybe procmail too. Possibly what is the final straw to break exmh's back is that sendmail no longer accepts messages from my exmh unless I have a live DNS connection. Good old: post: problem initializing server; [RPLY] 451 ... Sender domain must resolve send: message not delivered to anyone Hacked out the 451 reject rule in /etc/sendmail.cf, got another message. Hacked that one out, got yet another. And finally got a message I couldn't figure out where it was stopping. Didn't like the idea of clobering the default anti-spam sendmail rules, so either exmh goes or sendmail 8.9. Not much of a choice, not when mutt looks interesting. nmh-1.0 was announced the past week. Not sure if its in ports yet. But maybe replacing mh-6.8.4 with nmh will fix my mh/sendmail problem. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message