From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 6 23:39:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns.internet.dk (ns.internet.dk [194.19.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E38D37B491 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 23:39:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.internet.dk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with UUCP id f177dGh71004 for freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:39:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: from gina (gina.neland.dk [192.168.0.14]) by arnold.neland.dk (8.11.1/8.11.0) with SMTP id f177d2x54567 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:39:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Message-ID: <026001c090d9$1f8b4de0$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> Reply-To: "Leif Neland" From: "Leif Neland" To: Subject: cost of denying use of dns Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:39:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I've set our nameserver to only allow recursive lookups for our own = customers. However, now I wonder if it is more "expensive" to deny the lookup and = write the reject to a logfile than just go ahead and answer. Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message