From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 28 19:06:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F297106568B for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:06:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outG.internet-mail-service.net (outg.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4749A8FC12 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from idiom.com (mx0.idiom.com [216.240.32.160]) by out.internet-mail-service.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04835B7554 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:06:05 -0800 (PST) X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (h-67-100-89-137.snfccasy.static.covad.net [67.100.89.137]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A342D6011 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:06:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B39019C.1030705@elischer.org> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:06:04 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <90dbee150912261333l602c4161nccaf1995dc83699a@mail.gmail.com> <4B3691FF.3050402@elischer.org> <90dbee150912270236k3be6e530r80d9e7576274137c@mail.gmail.com> <20091228185801.GA5508@verio.net> In-Reply-To: <20091228185801.GA5508@verio.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: GIF MTU parmeter is needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:06:05 -0000 David DeSimone wrote: > Hideki Yamamoto wrote: >> h99# ifconfig xl0 inet6 2001:99::1 >> h99# ifconfig gif0 create >> h99# ifconfig gif0 inet tunnel 192.168.1.8 192.168.1.4 >> h99# route add -inet6 2001:98::/64 -interface gif0 >> add net 2001:98::/64: gateway gif0 >> h99# ifconfig gif0 up > > I wonder if the problem you're seeing is due to the MTU attached to the > static route that you're adding rather than the MTU of the interface. > > Try different command sequences and perform a "route get" to find out > what MTU is being applied to the routes, to see if they change to what > you expect. > Actually the route mtu will over-ride the interface mtu I think.. route change {address} mtu xxxx