From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Oct 24 7: 8:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D9437B479 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 07:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA44963; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:08:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Marius Bendiksen Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ideas concerning fsck References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 24 Oct 2000 16:08:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: Marius Bendiksen's message of "Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:45:35 +0200 (CEST)" Message-ID: Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Marius Bendiksen writes: > We can get around the need for fstab by using the bootfs idea that AIX and > others use (Poul-Henning has suggested this also in connection with DEVFS) > to get less magic in the boot sequence. I'm not familiar with the concept of bootfs - can somebody enlighten me? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message