From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 25 12:54:08 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72406106564A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:54:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from alp@rsu.ru)
Received: from mail.r61.net (mail.r61.net [195.208.245.249])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBB18FC20
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:54:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pyhalov.cc.rsu.ru (pyhalov.cc.rsu.ru [195.208.252.128])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by mail.r61.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2PCfrlc074674
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256
	verify=NOT)
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:41:53 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from alp@rsu.ru)
Message-ID: <4D8C8D91.2060002@rsu.ru>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:41:53 +0300
From: Alexander Pyhalov <alp@rsu.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110306 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Could /etc/rc.d/routing require bridge?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:54:08 -0000

Hello.
I'm just implementing the following network scheme on our freebsd hosts:
1) physical interface
2) for each vlanN on physical interface I create bridgeN and connect 
interface to the bridge
3) for each vnet jail which need access to vlanN I create epair and 
connect it to bridgeN
4) for real host I use the same scheme: I create epair and connect it to 
the bridge with necessary vlan.

I have the following problem: routing is started before bridge creation, 
so in default configuration host is inaccessible.
If I modify /etc/rc.d/routing script so that it requires bridge, 
everything is fine (I can reach my host).
So what is a reason for /etc/rc.d/routing to miss dependency on bridge?
-- 
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
system administrator of Computer Center of Southern Federal University