From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 22 13:46:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B3C106564A for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ltsampros@upnet.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [83.235.67.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2728FC18 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ltsampros@upnet.gr) Received: from bifteki.lan (ppp-94-66-49-109.home.otenet.gr [94.66.49.109]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n2MDE9ox026324; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:14:09 +0200 Received: from bifteki.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bifteki.lan (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n2MDE92Z012957; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:14:09 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ltsampros@bifteki.lan) Received: (from ltsampros@localhost) by bifteki.lan (8.14.3/8.14.2/Submit) id n2MDE9lx012956; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:14:09 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ltsampros) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:14:09 +0200 From: Leonidas Tsampros To: Ghirai Message-ID: <20090322131409.GA12747@bifteki.lan> References: <20090321015316.87f9531b.ghirai@ghirai.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090321015316.87f9531b.ghirai@ghirai.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: speed in extracting rar files - unrar vs. 7z X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:46:16 -0000 On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 01:53:16AM +0200, Ghirai wrote: > Hey, > > Does anyone know a faster way of extracting big rar files, or why is > it so slow? > > I did a quick test with time (extracting the same ~800MiB file, > consisting of split archives): > > unrar: > > real 4m29.637s > user 0m4.969s > sys 0m3.131s > > 7z: > > real 3m50.020s > user 0m4.784s > sys 0m1.821s > > In your place I'd try the archivers/rar port which is the commercial implementation from rarlab.com.