Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:10:46 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Valentin Nechayev <netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua>, Steve Roome <stephen_roome@yahoo.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: function calls/rets in assembly Message-ID: <3B89F276.578CEFE1@mindspring.com> References: <XFMail.010826230958.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > > Well, now you should add wanted options to /etc/make.conf and avoid > > seeing of such nightmares. > > Erm, the original topic of this dicussion was about attempting to use the > assembly from the C compiler to see how things work when writing one's own > assembly functions. Having to know magical extra parameters to pass to the > compiler to make this a fruitful exercise doesn't help. If the compiler were > more intelligent about the code it output by default in the first place, then > that would help. Should we all start chanting now? Sign extend to int! Sign extend to int! K&R were right! K&R were right! Sign extend to int! 8^P -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B89F276.578CEFE1>