From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 30 12:07:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB6B8BB; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:07:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4CA18FC13; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:07:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TePNg-0000O5-5v; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:07:44 +0100 Received: from 212-182-167-131.ip.telfort.nl ([212.182.167.131] helo=ronaldradial.home) by smtp.greenhost.nl with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TePNf-0002Js-RY; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:07:43 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: cperciva@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "Luca Ferrari" Subject: Re: simple patch for portsnap to use wget References: <1354040675.3923.3.camel@mjakubik.localdomain> <50B61482.5090702@unsane.co.uk> <746EFFD8-033B-4641-9222-86D262D5EAA3@fisglobal.com> <50B76D97.60302@unsane.co.uk> <20121129163100.0f257676@suse3> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:07:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.11 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Scan-Signature: a07cf4f22b7e0347d98fbeb4081a69be X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:07:47 -0000 On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:47:58 +0100, Luca Ferrari wrote: >> Why don't you notify the author of phttpget and ask for a bugfix? > > I'd love to see a bugfix for this issue, you are right I would have > been asked the author first.... > However I'm wondering why portsnap uses phttpget instead of fetch, > that is available in base. > > Luca phttpget is also in base And here you can read why it is used: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-November/070878.html Ronald