From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 21 17:18:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7A9106564A; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:18:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220628FC0C; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7LHIiCg002355; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:18:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7LHIhSq002354; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:18:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:18:43 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Ben Laurie Message-ID: <20120821171843.GA2142@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20120820220243.GA96700@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20120820225504.GA78528@server.rulingia.com> <5033346C.3080907@FreeBSD.org> <20120821073931.GA99502@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <86sjbga7fm.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20120821153408.GA1782@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav , Doug Barton , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /dev/random X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:18:47 -0000 On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:44:38PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Steve Kargl > wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:03:09PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > >> Steve Kargl writes: > >> > Well, only one person seems confused, but OP seems to remain adament > >> > in being terse in his questions. Yes, it seems OP has conflated PRNG > >> > and entropy, but again he seems to not want to explain his point of > >> > view. > >> > >> Maybe your attitude scared him off? > >> > > > > What attitude? Look at my first post. I asked > > Ben to explain *why* he thought it was a mistake. > > His 3 sentence response can be summarized as "I > > think it is a mistake, because that's what I > > think." > > Whatever. > > Have my other posts clarified sufficiently for you? Yes, Peter Jeremy's posts have been helpful as well as reading dev/random/probe.c. It is clear that this issue can effect only i386 and amd64 class platforms and in particular those platforms with a Via processors. -- Steve