From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 17 15:56:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 647C816A4D1; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:56:32 +0000 (GMT) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAF416A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:56:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [216.136.204.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFDD43D4C for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:56:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAHFuWZS072627 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:56:32 GMT (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: (from perforce@localhost) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iAHFuVeK072624 for perforce@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:56:31 GMT (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:56:31 GMT Message-Id: <200411171556.iAHFuVeK072624@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: repoman.freebsd.org: perforce set sender to jhb@freebsd.org using -f From: John Baldwin To: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: PERFORCE change 65336 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:56:33 -0000 http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=65336 Change 65336 by jhb@jhb_slimer on 2004/11/17 15:55:51 Update. Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/smpng/sys/notes#26 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/smpng/sys/notes#26 (text+ko) ==== @@ -49,12 +49,13 @@ buys is being able to swi_sched() from a fast handler, but that doesn't make sense because you can't actually enqueue a task onto its queue from a fast interrupt context -- "Optimize" atomic_store_rel() on i386 (it actually seems to be slower, - go figure) - + It is faster on UP, but slower on SMP, so tweak the patch so that we use - the non-MP safe 386 versions on all UP kernels. - Optimize spin locks on UP such that they don't do atomic operations - Untested - Unbenchmarked +- Try to fix problems with stuck IPIs by raising TPR and enabling interrupts + in spin loops. Need to perhaps generalize this so that critical sections + do this. That really needs to only be done in spinlock_*() (and maybe some + frobbing in intr_execute_handlers()) and needs to happen after the + spinlock_*() changes happen. Space reserved for child branches: