From owner-freebsd-current Tue Nov 4 13:52:00 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA10851 for current-outgoing; Tue, 4 Nov 1997 13:52:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from peedub.muc.de (newpc.muc.ditec.de [194.120.126.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA10841 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 1997 13:51:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garyj@peedub.muc.de) Received: from peedub.muc.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.muc.de (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA08609 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 1997 22:51:47 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <199711042151.WAA08609@peedub.muc.de> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [try this] (Was: ddb broken in -current?) Reply-To: Gary Jennejohn In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 03 Nov 1997 20:09:56 PST." <345EA014.15FB7483@whistle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 22:51:46 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Julian Elischer writes: >Anyone got a clue? >2 people have seen this now, >can other people try this experiment? > I see it too. Don't have a clue, though. --- Gary Jennejohn Home - garyj@muc.de Work - garyj@fkr.dec.com