From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Mar 29 13:11: 6 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AF837BDD2
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:10:17 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA89243;
	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:10:44 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: chad@DCFinc.com
Cc: cracauer@cons.org (Martin Cracauer), freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Let 3.x die ASAP? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:58:28 MST."
             <200003291758.KAA16393@freeway.dcfinc.com> 
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:10:44 -0800
Message-ID: <89240.954364244@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> I can understand wanting to play with the newer stuff.  But I'm not
> committing bread-n-butter to anything not cooked in the field for a
> while.  I'll let others pioneer.  So when I see the raft of "I just
> upgraded my 3.x machine to 4.0" messages, my first reaction is
> "Why?" and my second is "better you than me" and my third is "I hope
> you uncover some obscure bug so it can be fixed before I get there."

And you know what?  For production shops, this is *exactly* the right
attitude to have. :)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message