From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 02:31:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE94916A42C; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:31:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-5.paradise.net.nz (bm-5a.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D334428C; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:31:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (tclsnelb1-src-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.172]) by linda-5.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IZ4003V2SBWYL@linda-5.paradise.net.nz>; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:31:08 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-28-132.dsl.clear.net.nz [218.101.28.132]) by smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79ED051CAE; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:31:07 +1200 (NZST) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:30:51 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> To: Mike Jakubik Message-id: <4463F35B.5030404@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060417) References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , stable@FreeBSD.org, Julian Elischer , "Simon L. Nielsen" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 02:31:37 -0000 Mike Jakubik wrote: > Patches? For what? It's too late now, 6.1 has been released. I sent > reminders to the RE team and i made it quite clear on the lists that the > quota issue should be described in the relnotes/errata before the > release. If the RE team chooses to ignore major bugs and pretend all is > fine and dandy, then there is not much patches will do. Heck, im still > waiting for Scott to personally fix the problems, as he so graciously > offered, but couldn't deliver. I offered to work with him and provide > help, he never replied to my emails. I'm almost afraid to enter into this discussion (puts on flame suit), but might it be better to gently encourage the re/development team to make some of these a priority for 6.2? (as that gives everyone more lead time, and in the end what we all want is FreeBSD to steadily improve). Cheers Mark