From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Apr 17 00:15:09 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA15126
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA15120
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA11434; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>
X-Sender: dwhite@localhost
Reply-To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@obiwan.psinet.net.au>
cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: xload perm problems?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970414205251.693A-100000@obiwan.psinet.net.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970417001411.10694X-100000@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 14 Apr 1997, Adrian Chadd wrote:

> I've noted a lot of people installing 2.2 and 2.2.1 with the problem that
> xload isn't setgid to the kmem group.
> 
> Has this been fixed? If not, should I file a pr?

It's probably that way for all X releases in this cycle.  Unfortunately, I
don't know if filing a PR will do anything for you; it's not directly
controlled by FreeBSD per se.

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major