From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Nov 26 15:18:03 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id PAA10407 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 26 Nov 1995 15:18:03 -0800 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA10399 for ; Sun, 26 Nov 1995 15:17:58 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA13400; Sun, 26 Nov 1995 15:13:18 -0800 To: Chris Shenton cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thoughts on the install and on Red Hat Linux. In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 26 Nov 1995 10:57:00 EST." <199511261557.PAA10995@wirehead.hq.nasa.gov> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 15:13:18 -0800 Message-ID: <13398.817427598@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > A Mac-friend and I just spend about 16 hours trying to install Caldera > (RH Linux, plus Visix desktop, plus Novell, plus ...). What a > nightmare. The usual Linux root+boot disk (plus two, for Caldera), but > I can live with that (tho I certainly prefer *one* disk with FreeBSD). It definitely makes it a lot less confusing to deal with. The emergence of the ATAPI floppy was something I felt less than happy about. Every time I've looked at distributions from Slackware to RH, I've always been struck with the thought: "which of these 97 different images am I supposed to friggin' *use*?!" It's a bad first impression to make on any user who'd rather remain unconcerned with such minutia. > A simple design goal: don't let the user get down the road fail > because of something that could have been determined earlier. I agree. In fact, I'm coming around to a very different way of thinking about how "media devices" are chosen. It should be something that you can specify as a "chain", so that there are successive types of fallback. This would help make for a successful CD/FTP installation combo with full DES in the non-U.S. scenario (something I've always wanted to have work). > I'd suggest aggressive probing, then confirmation with the user, with > an "out" if the user doesn't know. Failing good information on HW > config, default to something most likely to work (eg: VGA X11, rather > than nothing; WD8003, if that's the most prevalent ether clone, etc). Anyone keen to reactivate the subject of a 2-stage boot? I also feel that I and whomever else does sysinstall/setup the next time around will only be able to do so much, then it's going to come down to how much BIOS information we can squirrel away. Jordan