From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 7 21:29:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A14106564A for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 21:29:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net) Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2001:470:9a47::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C76E8FC08 for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 21:29:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (localhost.spoerlein.net [IPv6:::1]) by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA7LTJQ1003010 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:29:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=spoerlein.net; s=dkim200908; t=1289165359; bh=z1ga7PHBtszaBPlgz4X82ywPRbt26pIt2lqQx4g8rZ8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=oNv3n1rNcEb/GCFI0svERQJX3ihs8uVBGtXzaO4vUHlcqEmI6jnnAIPL8vJ57BFl/ pgMk8BVFWEjDLNFldF9Ng6hHcxRakF9leVJ+sZpXWKYYqtqpND1/LgglzmR0OLxmsc cBEMc+7TxiObInPxg1/8ke1j9JmBe4SPDsej3AiY= Received: (from uqs@localhost) by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oA7LTIuZ003009; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:29:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net) Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:29:18 +0100 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= To: Tony Finch Message-ID: <20101107212918.GP85693@acme.spoerlein.net> Mail-Followup-To: Tony Finch , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tricky subversion import, what to do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 21:29:23 -0000 On Sun, 07.11.2010 at 17:18:43 +0000, Tony Finch wrote: > > this is about importing unifdef 2.4, which has no significant code > > changes, but that's not the point. > > I maintain unifdef and I haven't imported 2.4 because there are no code > changes. Please leave it alone. As I wrote, that's beside the point and not the question at hand. How/where should it end up in our tree? Is it vendor code? Is it contrib code? And if so how to bootstrap the correct subversion history ... Uli