From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 19:12:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FFD106566C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:12:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1CC8FC18 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9JJC7Sb007824; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:12:07 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id p9JJC79A007821; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:12:07 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:12:07 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Oliver Pinter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4E984BF9.4000700@FreeBSD.org> <1318607697-31950-1-git-send-email-lacombar@gmail.com> <4E9DA38F.1040305@FreeBSD.org> <006E57CF-F21F-4245-935A-9F391F0BCBEA@xcllnt.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:12:08 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , Andriy Gapon , Marcel Moolenaar , Olivier Smedts , FreeBSD Current , Arnaud Lacombe Subject: Re: possible mountroot regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:12:10 -0000 On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Oliver Pinter wrote: > On 10/19/11, Olivier Smedts wrote: >> 2011/10/19 Marcel Moolenaar : >>> On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> >>>> Would you be able to commit a variant of this patch sans the 'x' part? >>> >>> Yes, soonish. If people like the 'x' change I can do that in a followup >>> commit as well. I just need to know if people like it or not... >> >> Yes, it's useful. But why not "q" for "quit" ? Just a bikeshed color idea... >> > eXit :) In some languages... More important to me is the "the Abort manual input" which tells what it does but not why the user would want to do that. Abort manual input... and then what? Hang? Retry? Panic? Reboot? Resume attempting to mount the root device that was expected?