From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 22 11: 1:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo.feral.com [192.67.166.79]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2B937B403; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:01:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from wonky.feral.com (wonky.feral.com [192.67.166.7]) by beppo.feral.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f5MI1Mg74887; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:01:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:01:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: To: John Baldwin Cc: Subject: Re: Two Junior Kernel Hacker tasks.. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20010622105917.N20923-100000@wonky.feral.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > > sys/${MACHINE_ARCH}/compile? > > Sure, fine. I don't really care which, I just would like the problem solved > somehow. :) I seem to recall that the 2 or 3 times I've brought this up over the last 3-4 years either Bruce or Peter or both said No!, but my memory could be playing me false. What *I* do is NFS mount my test source from a common machine, but then nfs loopback mount the compile directory for each machine. I'd use a nullfs mount if that worked. This has the feature of avoiding the multiplatform foo (mostly- it's been known to break over the last year or so), and also to get more reasonable compile performance. -matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message