From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon Mar 19 16:20:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7991D37B71F for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:20:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2K0JTg12392; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:19:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200103200019.f2K0JTg12392@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How serious are we about ccc? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:36:45 GMT." <99656d$hgs$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:19:29 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Do we consider ccc (ports/lang/compaq-cc) just a curiosity and > squarely put the blame on ccc if something doesn't build with it, > or do we want ccc do have a modicum of usefulness? This is really a question best left to people like you that might actually care about it. By the sounds of it, yes. > haven't examined yet. Is there any worth in investigating these > problems? Personally, I would encourage you to do so, yes. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message