From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 10 14:30:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3F416A4CE for ; Mon, 10 May 2004 14:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20EC43D45 for ; Mon, 10 May 2004 14:30:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i4ALUTCG026213 for ; Mon, 10 May 2004 14:30:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i4ALUTer026212; Mon, 10 May 2004 14:30:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 14:30:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200405102130.i4ALUTer026212@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: ports/66439: portupgrade -R pilot-link-0.11.8_2 fails with latest cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mikhail Teterin List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 21:30:30 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/66439; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mikhail Teterin To: Stacey Roberts Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/66439: portupgrade -R pilot-link-0.11.8_2 fails with latest cvsup Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 17:27:28 -0400 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/66439 = === Aborted, please remove /nonexistent =I noted the message, but I'm a bit weary of removing that directory as =its was created, and being used by gdm, the www user and one or two =others *by default*. That is, I did-not-create-that directory. =What I'm curious about is the fact that I've been using FreeBSD / Gnome =/ Evolution / pilot-link on this box for years, without having this =issue until now. Is there something in this.., I made pilot-link default to Tk-8.4 (rather than 8.3 as before). So it tries to build Tk-8.4 and fails because /nonexistent is there. I have no idea, why gdm would create it... Gnome, any comments? If you are happy with Tk-8.3 and don't want to install 8.4 just for pilot-link, you can add TCL_VER=8.3 to either /etc/make.conf or to the make's command line. -mi