From owner-freebsd-current Sun May 14 12:25:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from orthanc.ab.ca (orthanc.ab.ca [207.167.3.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA6D37B5FA for ; Sun, 14 May 2000 12:25:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca) Received: from orthanc.ab.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orthanc.ab.ca (8.10.0.Beta11/8.10.0.Beta6) with ESMTP id e4EJPHN32617; Sun, 14 May 2000 13:25:17 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200005141925.e4EJPHN32617@orthanc.ab.ca> To: Will Andrews Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 14 May 2000 15:07:14 EDT." <20000514150714.J82488@argon.blackdawn.com> Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 13:25:16 -0600 From: Lyndon Nerenberg Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I like the idea, but the -l flag conflicts with a different usage for SVR4 derived makes (on at least AIX, Irix, and Solaris): -l load Specifies that no new jobs (commands) should be started if there are others jobs running and the load average is at least load (a floating-point number). With no argument, removes a previous load limit. Maybe this should instead be a -d sub-option? And I like the idea of adding the -l functionality described above. --lyndon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message