From nobody Wed Feb 7 00:44:25 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-toolchain@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TV1bH4cFKz58K5p; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 00:44:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (spindle.one-eyed-alien.net [199.48.129.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TV1bH1H8gz44jY; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 00:44:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (Postfix, from userid 3001) id ED4B63C019A; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 00:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 00:44:25 +0000 From: Brooks Davis To: Mark Millard Cc: FreeBSD Toolchain , FreeBSD Mailing List , Brooks Davis Subject: Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ? Message-ID: References: <78C3797B-BCA5-4FFA-A14E-8A3135DAD95A.ref@yahoo.com> <78C3797B-BCA5-4FFA-A14E-8A3135DAD95A@yahoo.com> <71F86B94-6D27-4CE4-8FD5-321538DAB6EF@yahoo.com> <4FCDBDD8-183F-47D6-A35D-6B4AC042B7B7@yahoo.com> List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD s integrated toolchain List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-toolchain List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FCDBDD8-183F-47D6-A35D-6B4AC042B7B7@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TV1bH1H8gz44jY X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:199.48.128.0/22, country:US] On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 04:22:51PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > On Feb 6, 2024, at 15:11, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On Feb 6, 2024, at 15:02, Mark Millard wrote: > > > >> Using BE_STANDRD, I built llvm18 as part of a poudriere > >> bulk run, which resulted in: > >> > >> # ls -Tlod /usr/local/llvm18/lib/libLLVM*.so > >> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel uarch 15 Feb 6 13:34:30 2024 /usr/local/llvm18/lib/libLLVM-18.1.0rc.so -> libLLVM-18rc.so > >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel uarch 138305928 Feb 6 13:30:11 2024 /usr/local/llvm18/lib/libLLVM-18rc.so > >> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel uarch 15 Feb 6 13:34:30 2024 /usr/local/llvm18/lib/libLLVM.so -> libLLVM-18rc.so > > Sorry for the confusing additional notation: > > > >> > > > > that showed in in the E-mail. I had not noticed at the time that > > the mail program was helping me in that way: it was not deliberate > > on my part. > > > >> But later in the pooudriere bulk run when mesa-dri tried to build > >> it complained about not finding libLLVM-18.so : > >> > >> [amd64_ZFS] Extracting llvm-18_1,1: .......... done > >> ===> mesa-dri-23.3.5 depends on shared library: libLLVM-18.so - not found > > The following suggest more names that might be problematical > in devel/llvm18 as thigns are --and includes the *rc.so one: > > # grep "\" /usr/ports/devel/llvm18/pkg-plist > bin/llvm-rc%%LLVM_SUFFIX%% > llvm%%LLVM_SUFFIX%%/bin/llvm-rc > llvm%%LLVM_SUFFIX%%/lib/libLLVM-%%LLVM_RELEASE%%rc.so > %%CLANG%%llvm%%LLVM_SUFFIX%%/lib/libclang.so.%%LLVM_RELEASE%%rc > %%LLDB%%llvm%%LLVM_SUFFIX%%/lib/liblldb.so.%%LLVM_RELEASE%%rc This comes from upstream and will change with the release: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/22683463740e55e7e0d7e664395c30899b229205 I wonder if mesa is inappropriately hard coding the library name or if there's a cmake file issue that should be resolved upstream (those generally seem to reference static libs though). $ llvm-config18 --libs -lLLVM-18rc -- Brooks