From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 3 00:08:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FB616A41F; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 00:08:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vkushnir@i.kiev.ua) Received: from horse.iptelecom.net.ua (horse.iptelecom.net.ua [212.9.224.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5651E43D46; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 00:08:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vkushnir@i.kiev.ua) Received: from h52.240.159.dialup.iptcom.net ([213.159.240.52]:36567 "EHLO kushnir1.kiev.ua" ident: "SOCKFAULT1" whoson: "vkushnir") by horse.iptelecom.net.ua with ESMTP id S1219345AbVKCAIy (ORCPT + 2 others); Thu, 3 Nov 2005 02:08:54 +0200 Received: from kushnir1.kiev.ua (kushnir1.kiev.ua [10.0.0.1]) by kushnir1.kiev.ua (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA308qXQ020077; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 02:08:52 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vkushnir@i.kiev.ua) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 02:08:51 +0200 (EET) From: Vladimir Kushnir X-X-Sender: vkushnir@kushnir1.kiev.ua To: Max Laier In-Reply-To: <200511030059.05946.max@love2party.net> Message-ID: <20051103020404.J85422@kushnir1.kiev.ua> References: <20051027022313.R675@kushnir1.kiev.ua> <200511021035.22990.max@love2party.net> <20051103001509.C85422@kushnir1.kiev.ua> <200511030059.05946.max@love2party.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CURRENT + amd64 + user-ppp = panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 00:08:58 -0000 On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Max Laier wrote: >> >> Here it is: right before panic it prints >> >> For 0xffffff0017531100 -1 ticks >> For 0xffffff0017531100 -1 ticks > > This results in two consecutive callout_stop() calls, but shouldn't hurt as > callout_stop is protected against that. > > Do you get a dump for this? Can you compare this pointer to the global > llinfo_nd6 and see if "c" from the softclock() frame is related (or maybe the > previous item in the list TAILQ). > Sorry I'm not very goot at debugging. Would you please give me some instructions (lamer's level, preferably :-)). And anyway I'll be able to do it tomorrow only. TIA, Vladimir