From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Sep  3 13:43:46 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from xerxes.lovett.com (xerxes.lovett.com [216.60.121.164])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD15214E37
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  3 Sep 1999 13:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ade@lovett.com)
Received: from ade by xerxes.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.03 #1)
	id 11N0BI-00034Y-00; Fri, 03 Sep 1999 15:43:32 -0500
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 15:43:32 -0500
From: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com>
To: "Justin M. Seger" <jseger@scds.com>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: lang/tclX75
Message-ID: <19990903154332.P9489@supernews.com>
References: <19990903135634.K9489@lovett.com> <199909032029.QAA43467@scds.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.7i
In-Reply-To: <199909032029.QAA43467@scds.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 04:29:28PM -0400, Justin M. Seger wrote:
> 
> That is one goal, however we just can't nuke tcl 7.5...  We need to
> fix all ports that depend on it.  If you'd like to help with this,
> send in patches that fix things.

Oh, I plan to, have no fear of that :)  Probably get started on it
over the Labor Day weekend -- still too hot to do anything sensible
outside..

Question though.  Which tcl/tk should we be aiming for on these
port upgrades?  8.0, 8.1 or 8.2?


> I'm asking about tclX75 because it is old, and nothing else depends on it.

Yup.  One less port that would depend on tk41, too.  Nuke it.

-aDe

-- 
Ade Lovett, Austin, TX.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message