Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:46:17 +0200 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Sizov <root@arpanet.ru> Cc: ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: portsnap fetch bug or quality Message-ID: <46EA2029.4050002@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <7410602826.20070914035503@arpanet.ru> References: <1091994189.20070913041709@arpanet.ru> <46E941D0.5020204@FreeBSD.org> <7410602826.20070914035503@arpanet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Sizov wrote: >>> The number of fetching patches (1980) != number of fetched patches >>> (143[8-9]). Why it happens? > >> Does it happen only on portsnap3, right? > > Yes. I dunno why, but portsnap3 had strange behaviors since the beginning. Apart from speed (it's the slowest from here), I always had disconnections and errors when fetching many (hundreds) updates, and recently I saw also the very same mismatch: I thought about another premature disconnection, but no, it fetched all the updates even if the number was incorrect. Perhaps Colin can give us an explanation. -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46EA2029.4050002>