From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 23:14:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CE6FC2 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 23:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578FD8FC12 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 23:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBD2F2.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.210.242]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qB9NERm0077292; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:14:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qB9NEQgc010748; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:14:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB9NEDmU050541; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:14:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201212092314.qB9NEDmU050541@fire.js.berklix.net> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:31:04 MST." <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:14:13 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Brett Glass X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 23:14:36 -0000 Brett Glass wrote: > At 07:42 AM 12/9/2012, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > >It has nothing to do with clang; it is not the default compiler for 9.1, > >and will never be for the 9.x series. Using it to compile your system > >(or ports) is entirely optional. > > I am actually eagerly awaiting a completely "un-GNUed" toolchain. But I am > glad that this is not the holdup. I just need to plan my time so that I get > a vacation SOMETIME this season and also keep my commitments. Alas, there > have been no updates to the projected schedule or to the "To Do" list to > help me out. > > --Brett Glass Hi those eagerly awaiting, Re-read Eitan's post of Sun, 9 Dec 2012 09:04:25 -0500 (15:04 CET) Those with knowledge, time & enthusiasm can already build their own 9.1-RELEASE from released public sources. No longer need to wait. As I wrote 3 local friends Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:37:20 +0100 ] In case you'r waiting to upgrade any production servers to latest release: ] { ] Although FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE has not been announced yet, it's available: ] in (ctm distributed) CVS tree (I admit I havent converted to use svn yet) ] grep RELENG_9_1_0_RELEASE /pub/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-CVS/src/Makefile,v ] I am exporting with ] cvs -R export -r RELENG_9_1_0_RELEASE src # du=867 M tgz=149 M ] ports & doc have not been tagged yet, they will later be: ] cvs -R export -r RELEASE_9_1_0 ports # du=... M tgz=... M ] cvs -R export -r RELEASE_9_1_0 doc ] ] The .iso images are not in ftp.freebsd.org or eg ftp2.de.freebsd.org yet, ] (& I havent bothered to look for packages as I dont use them, I always ] compile my own ports) ] I assume the delay to announce release is 'cos they're still recovering ] from their security intrusion & still rebuilding packages after ] http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html ] ] freebsd.org also have sigbus issues with cvsup (affecting send-pr), ] may also be slowing build cluster ] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2012-December/041352.html Clue to a quick check with CVS is/was grep RELENG_9_1_0_RELEASE /usr/cvs/src/Makefile,v grep RELEASE_9_1_0 /usr/cvs/ports/Makefile,v but as CVS is about to disappear, what's a quick check for svn ? Compliments to re@ team who have doubtless been working very hard, probably on a problematic cluster base. Hopefully there'll be less "When ?" questions that might distract re@, now people realise it's tagged & you can build yourself if you're in a rush. ports/ is also tagged & available: From: Thomas Abthorpe Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 19:59:09 +0000 To: ports@freebsd.org (though no tag for that yet in preceeding cvs-cur 19073 ) Those who want this lot must wait till announcement (a few days I guess) binaries compiled at freebsd.org + for all architectures, + packages build on freebsd.org cluster + docs + iso's built + all ftp'd from master server to mirror servers globaly + Release Notes written by re@ team who are doubtless tired, & working flat out ;-) + all of that work to be done on a freebsd cluster that was compromised & needed to be checked before the relase rolled, Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.