From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 4 09:05:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8629B16A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:05:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from hanoi.cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88D743D1F for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:05:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by hanoi.cronyx.ru id i24H58Wi054295 for cvs-src@FreeBSD.org.checked; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Thu, 4 Mar 2004 20:05:08 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: from cronyx.ru (hi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.94]) by hanoi.cronyx.ru with ESMTP id i24H2Cqg054137; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Thu, 4 Mar 2004 20:02:12 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Message-ID: <404761CE.80602@cronyx.ru> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 20:05:18 +0300 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: non@ever.sanda.gr.jp References: <20040303.102155.38697537.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040303.104935.73668905.imp@bsdimp.com> <404655DE.4060204@cronyx.ru> <20040304.110206.36183582.non@ever.sanda.gr.jp> In-Reply-To: <20040304.110206.36183582.non@ever.sanda.gr.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: rik@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org cc: nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org cc: imp@bsdimp.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4/man4.i386 ct.4 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 17:05:53 -0000 non@ever.sanda.gr.jp wrote: >From: Roman Kurakin >Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 01:02:06 +0300 > > >>Renaming of one of the devices would solve naming problems but >>it would hit one group of users. I think there is a compromis >> >>1. If we have PC98, man4.i386 wouldn't appear in such installation. >>So man ct wouldn't confuse scsi ct users. >> >> > >Currently, no. Pages in man4.i386 are also installed for i386/pc98. > > >>2. If we have i386 installation and man for scsi ct would be added >>we just need something like man4.pc98 to put it there and it would >>be hidden in i386 arch for Cronyx/Tau users. >> >> > >Well, I have had ct.4 for several months. I was suggested not to >commit ct.4 into man4.i386 but to create man4.pc98 and add into it by >Warner-san. > >Probably we can create man4.pc98, then copy and modify Makefile so >that we don't have to put copys into man4.pc98 (I am not sure here), >and change src/share/man/man4/Makefile, > >--- /usr/src/share/man/man4/Makefile Wed Jul 16 09:03:29 2003 >+++ Makefile Thu Mar 4 10:58:07 2004 >@@ -355,8 +355,8 @@ > MLINKS+=xl.4 if_xl.4 > > # XXX NOT IMPORTED: man4.hp300 man4.sparc man4.tahoe man4.vax >-.if exists(${.CURDIR}/man4.${MACHINE_ARCH}) >-SUBDIR= man4.${MACHINE_ARCH} >+.if exists(${.CURDIR}/man4.${MACHINE}) >+SUBDIR= man4.${MACHINE} > .endif > > .include > > >Or maybe, >man4/man4.i386 common >man4/man4.i386/i386 specific to i386 >man4/man4.i386/pc98 specific to pc98 > > This is better, cause I if get right, we could have MACHINE_ARCH=i386 and MACHINE other thane i386 or pc98. Roman >// Noriaki Mitsunaga > > > >