From owner-cvs-all Wed Oct 24 7:27: 2 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154FD37B407; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 07:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) id f9OEQmv76180; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 18:26:48 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 18:26:46 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdio stdio.c Message-ID: <20011024182645.A75942@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200110232248.f9NMm0Y19403@freefall.freebsd.org> <56612.1003916009@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56612.1003916009@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 11:33:29 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > What problem does this address? What change in behaviour will > end-users see? If sseek happens after reading, fseek/ftell position calculated inside read buffer can become wrong (!= read offset) producing wrong result to end user. But we not affected because clear read buffer after each fseek and use only sseek(0) internally, so this change backed out. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message