From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon May 21 16:11:19 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1293CEF5EF8 for ; Mon, 21 May 2018 16:11:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78D9C8457D for ; Mon, 21 May 2018 16:11:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from guardian.ventu (wilbur.aviozzano-guglielmozamboni.it [88.147.119.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w4LGB3vm068266 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 21 May 2018 18:11:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host wilbur.aviozzano-guglielmozamboni.it [88.147.119.19] claimed to be guardian.ventu Subject: Re: Proxy a TCP connection To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <2346bc5f-1ca3-3b6a-ac1a-c496e94eb969@netfence.it> <40qGSP6TW1z5BbC@baobab.bilink.it> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <8a9d5799-5451-7f0a-cbd7-64728ab8ae85@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 18:10:58 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <40qGSP6TW1z5BbC@baobab.bilink.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.83 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 16:11:19 -0000 On 05/21/18 13:16, Luciano Mannucci wrote: > On Fri, 18 May 2018 23:29:33 +0200 > Andrea Venturoli wrote: > >> Does anyone have a good suggestion for a program similar to the above ones? >> I require nothing fancy, I just want it to be reliable. > The oldest, the simplest, the most reliable (I'm still using it, and > it shoud be in the ports): > > Peter da Silva's plugdaemon > > I'm using it since last century... > > Luciano. > Thanks to anyone who answered. I'm currently trying net/bounce, as suggested by Eugene. If that won't work properly, I'll sure give plugdaemon a shot. bye av.