From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 14 20:20:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687AD10656A8 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 20:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CE98FC16 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 20:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4EKKCtu040169 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 20:20:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p4EKKCYT040168; Sat, 14 May 2011 20:20:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 20:20:12 GMT Message-Id: <201105142020.p4EKKCYT040168@freefall.freebsd.org> To: apache@FreeBSD.org From: Doug Barton Cc: Subject: Re: ports/153565: APACHE_PORT needs to be better documented X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Doug Barton List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 20:20:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/153565; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Doug Barton To: ohauer@FreeBSD.org Cc: apache@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/153565: APACHE_PORT needs to be better documented Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 13:16:02 -0700 On 05/14/2011 08:29, ohauer@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: APACHE_PORT needs to be better documented > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: ohauer > State-Changed-When: Sat May 14 15:28:36 UTC 2011 > State-Changed-Why: > bsd.apache.mk has now new documentation also on > - http://wiki.freebsd.org/bsd.apache.mk There is no documentation of APACHE_PORT in bsd.apache.mk, and no reference to the wiki in that file. Please try to take another look at this from the standpoint of a user, and consider re-opening the PR, and adding some actual documentation to at least bsd.apache.mk. Thanks, Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/