Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 22:42:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Paul Herman <pherman@frenchfries.net> To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: randy@psg.com, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: apparently FreeBSD-specific DNS failure Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008072204150.326-100000@bagabeedaboo.security.at12.de> In-Reply-To: <77456.965675210@verdi.nethelp.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000 sthaug@nethelp.no wrote: > If you *really* want to open that can of worms, have a look at > draft-oscarsson-i18ndns-00.txt: OK, but to sum up (and kill) this thread: The '_' character in domain names is: legal in RFC 1033 not legal in RFC 1035 not legal in RFC 1123 legal in RFC 2181 legal in draft-oscarsson-i18ndns-00 However, according to RFC 2400 which names the documents which are currently standard, required, recommended, elective, proposed, or just drafts, only RFC 1123 is required. RFC 1033 is not even mentioned RFC 1035 is recommended RFC 2181 is elective draft-oscarsson-i18ndns-00 is a new draft this year, (not mentioned) I, too, hope that the papers written by Randy Bush, Dan Oscarsson and others will someday (soon!) become required internet standards. I tip my hat (if I had one) off to them. However, I think we can very safely say that (at least on August 7th, 2000) the '_' character is not a "legal" character in a domain name. (This is actually a FAQ from comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains, so I apologize for stating the already stated.) -Paul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0008072204150.326-100000>