From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 28 02:18:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90B116A4CE for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:18:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6436643D39 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:18:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rgrempel@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so459436wri for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:18:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iHK4ib4idPO06FUZAogB5aBt5bx/QeAplOGil6R+TYvGPccka9Blijg/wO9/HiDL6oe0VPwvPY1/AFo3aex5oal6StFJBZhwtTWWbhG+vODUmFwZltk0UgE4yTDxaJKie56T7/LJd5QdJGAmJpoCBlZwBT/o5VPK/DCrGy1Y6E0= Received: by 10.54.79.5 with SMTP id c5mr496841wrb; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.39.18 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:18:14 -0500 From: Ryan Rempel To: Gavin Atkinson In-Reply-To: <1114625632.21968.34.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050425105919.GA95908@e-Gitt.NET> <1114625632.21968.34.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nss_ldap / top startup X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ryan Rempel List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:18:16 -0000 On 4/27/05, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > A while back, there was talk of a FreeBSD libc name cache daemon, but I > can't seem to find any reference to it now (I seem to remember the > website was within .ru, if it helps anyone find it) - though I'm not > sure it would help in this context or even if it's really the correct > way to mask the bug. Perhaps you are thinking of sysutils/lookupd and sysutils/lookupd-ldap in the ports tree? I've been using those in conjuction with nss-ldap and I've been happy with the results (though I don't have enough users to stress things the way you folks do).