From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 28 11:10:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B70E22A; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:10:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.69.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC57EBE; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r0SBAD2v074620; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:10:13 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r0SBADNn074619; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:10:13 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:10:13 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: ng_ether naming Message-ID: <20130128111013.GI53596@FreeBSD.org> References: <50C9C012.8020306@FreeBSD.org> <50C9C55A.5090900@ipfw.ru> <50CA0161.1060000@FreeBSD.org> <50CB5B8A.8030703@FreeBSD.org> <75277A1B-B434-4220-A800-9004C29DA92A@gmail.com> <51050CA5.8030805@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51050CA5.8030805@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Ermal Lu?i , Nikolay Denev , "Alexander V. Chernikov" , freebsd-net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:10:21 -0000 On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 01:16:53PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: A> based on your suggestions and submissions I've produced the following patch: A> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/ng_ether-renaming.diff A> A> It's only compile-tested at the moment :) A> but I'd like to get your opinion about the direction of the change(s). A> I am going to really test the change very soon. Patch is okay. If you wan't to close all related PRs, you also need to patch ppp(8), so that it does same sanitation of interface names when running PPPoE. And probably drop a note to Dmitry, who maintains mpd5. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.