From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 14 18:57:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738D537B400; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:57:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 16B50534A; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 03:57:42 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Robert Watson Cc: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG, Peter Wemm , Murray Stokely , current@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVS Issues with branch.. Was: Re: HEADS UP: Be nice to -CURRENT ( "1 week Feature Slush" ) References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 15 Mar 2002 03:57:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Robert Watson writes: > It's worth noting, BTW, that originally the release engineering team > planned to use Perforce for this to avoid the branch issue entirely, > minimize impact on the main tree, etc, but decided not to due to the high > volume of complaints on the topic. If it allows you to do your job better and quicker, use it. I was actually going to suggest it myself, but I didn't think anybody would take me seriously... DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message