From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Oct 30 14:36:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA03964 for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Fri, 30 Oct 1998 14:36:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from k6n1.znh.org (dialup16.gaffaneys.com [208.155.161.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA03950 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 1998 14:36:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zach@gaffaneys.com) Received: (from zach@localhost) by k6n1.znh.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) id WAA24044 for freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Oct 1998 22:37:35 GMT (envelope-from zach) Message-ID: <19981030163734.A882@znh.org> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 16:37:34 -0600 From: Zach Heilig To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Digital 21140 based card... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The exact card I'm looking at (haven't bought it yet): digital 21140-AC DC1036DA 21-43864-01 (C) (M) DEC 1995 515658-11 A 9641 0D912E (Cogent EM110 TX/T4 PCI Uc) I see these might be supported, but there are still some questions: 1) I see on line 374 of dc21040reg.h, there is the constant: TULIP_COGENT_EM100TX_ID .. Shouldn't this be TULIP_COGENT_EM110TX_ID? I see both used, EM110_TX on lines 2272 and 2273 of if_de.c, and EM100_TX on line 374 of dc21040reg.h and line 2269 of if_de.c. 2) Are these things any good? For example two computers with occasionally heavy NFS traffic between them. Or should I look somewhere else entirely? -- Zach Heilig If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have to at least consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidę on our hands (Douglas Adams -- Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message