From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 23 13:41:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DB91065676 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:41:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D508FC0A for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:41:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7NDfbwG022002 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:41:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7NDfbK4022001 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:41:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) X-Authentication-Warning: kontrol.kode5.net: jamie set sender to jamie@kode5.net using -f Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:41:37 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120823134137.GA21352@kontrol.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <448vd5pwsd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <448vd5pwsd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> x-operating-system: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE amd64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at kontrol.kode5.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Issue with kernel building X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:41:40 -0000 [ Lowell Gilbert wrote on Thu 23.Aug'12 at 9:23:14 -0400 ] > antonin tessier writes: > > > I have a problem when I try to build my own kernel. I had never got such a one; here is my kernel configuration file and the building errors that it makes. > Or just stay with GENERIC; most consumer PCs have no real reason to need > a customized kernel. I agree. It boots quickly and it isn't really necessary for the majority of users. I can be useful to learn the procedure, etc. but didn't use the correct command anyway: make buildkernel KERNCONF=KERNELCONFIG ^^^^^^^^^^^