From owner-cvs-all Thu Jun 22 14:11:31 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from pawn.primelocation.net (pawn.primelocation.net [205.161.238.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC28A37BE80; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 14:11:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jedgar@fxp.org) Received: by pawn.primelocation.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 7740A9B1F; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 17:11:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pawn.primelocation.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBEEBA16; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 17:11:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 17:11:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris D. Faulhaber" X-Sender: jedgar@pawn.primelocation.net To: Will Andrews Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/gdcd Makefile ports/audio/gdcd/patches patch-ad In-Reply-To: <20000622145547.A61492@argon.gryphonsoft.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Will Andrews wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 07:53:55AM -0400, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote: > > Would GTK_CONFIG be more appropriate? > > Sure, if "gtk-config" wasn't hardcoded in the Makefile. > Ummm, perhaps I was unclear. Would it not be more appropriate to make use of the GTK_CONFIG variable you are using in the port's Makefile instead of hardcoding yet another value? Chances are there will be problems if someone overrides GTK_CONFIG. ----- Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message