From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Mar 18 03:43:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8B9D10210 for ; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 03:43:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjasen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com (mail-qt0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A12CF15F3 for ; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 03:43:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjasen@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id x35so76368699qtc.2 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 20:43:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=36GNrsNMbUtwYCkcsuzhJY9hwDzepgojshWoDZJNzn4=; b=OYygj6r31nbgP/0jZ2q0xqVqqoTmk616x20DWYXBgrnR7WHiV/+ERaLzEwtoHJd/Ve BQtstBl3WyVg9HC+Iqu2pAB0ofP8moZnqf2yBSqBrNjsSyjgFA9tOwBFVd9vThMmbPJy SxrPrUejwwJCBeS6lL5/NhXzkvsbTsPwSrY2ZCDuzYHtVb4btp2h4TtLFMecgghGbHh/ QhoE/ScQNqgLEGBnG3pr5h62Ir+6MK58ILUArdfB4Aw2o2KAcnc6AgKZZcEUckegURXN xG1DYxe46u1NSDut/J64B8+uywQ/SC6WisrLatBwvhk4J+AbCTSpXC+sQzj6phaHWms0 UV6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=36GNrsNMbUtwYCkcsuzhJY9hwDzepgojshWoDZJNzn4=; b=k1nWuXA+bckRxqVKAL3Rp1JwK8chv2eor/0jXfP1AAo9KkDKTi1z53Yui3Zi7wzGZb yYw2ihDoNBpH39l1ZalKYcN7CQNXOIMy0rMVjJjPxhNyKhVojQpzFjcNYdmjGMezcw20 Txy5pn5WfTSKt3WeKxUodmuce9Jv4iO4T80ZnXzK6yy6Dign8jmc+asQiC6HUcIE3Trs 3uQOoJNO672KFd4VlEBAmBMR54AgHjXPEJRk4u55nyNuWM8Y9BHGiT43cjxoJyJ3EDws S8jkJL0kfFBW0AzjCpwtDIPQD5bcOXsjCRBiIvGWmvMUCepCFzKMRuB7DPfEvdVd/mGd wOOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H16etcqJNfxmcRDh75Kjn27ZV5ItVo34hiiUj66FxnXgH5t1Gp3TA6qqAARa41zBg== X-Received: by 10.200.3.157 with SMTP id t29mr17275877qtg.110.1489808614827; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 20:43:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.230] (pool-71-244-225-114.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [71.244.225.114]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s28sm7344746qts.65.2017.03.17.20.43.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Mar 2017 20:43:33 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bad throughput performance on multiple systems: Re: Fwd: Re: Disappointing packets-per-second performance results on a Dell,PE R530 To: Navdeep Parhar References: <7d349edd-0c81-2e3f-d3b9-27af232de76d@gmail.com> <20170209153409.GG41673@dwarf> <6ad029e0-86c6-af3d-8fc3-694d4bcdc683@gmail.com> <20170312231826.GV15630@zxy.spb.ru> <74654520-b8b6-6118-2e46-902a8ea107ac@gmail.com> <173fffac-7ae2-786a-66c0-e9cd7ab78f44@gmail.com> <20170317100814.GN70430@zxy.spb.ru> <9924b2d5-4a72-579c-96c6-4dbdacc07c95@gmail.com> Cc: Slawa Olhovchenkov , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , "Caraballo-vega, Jordan A." From: John Jasen Message-ID: <9694e9f2-daec-924d-e9f6-7b22a634acb5@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 23:43:32 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 03:43:36 -0000 On 03/17/2017 03:32 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:21 PM, John Jasen wrote: >> Yes. >> We were hopeful, initially, to be able to achieve higher packet >> forwarding rates through either netmap-fwd or due to enhancements based >> off https://wiki.freebsd.org/ProjectsRoutingProposal > Have you tried netmap-fwd? I'd be interested in how that did in your tests. We have. On this particular box, (11-STABLE, netmap-fwd fresh from git) it took about 1.7m pps in, dropped 500k, and passed about 800k. I'm lead to believe that vcxl interfaces may yield better results? Thanks!