From owner-freebsd-net Mon Feb 18 13:49:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7291D37B416 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:49:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from randy by rip.psg.com with local (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16cvfH-000EqY-00; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:49:39 -0800 From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Sean Chittenden Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ethernet bonding/load balancing on fbsd 4-stable References: <003501c1b7a8$4431d5f0$0500a8c0@notes> <20020217205620.GN413@overlord.e-gerbil.net> <20020218134405.A6619@ninja1.internal> Message-Id: Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:49:39 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> The only real "cisco only" protocol is the PAgP (Port Aggregation >> Protocol) which is essentially just a FEC auto-negiotation protocol they >> made up. AFAIK noone other then Cisco actually implements this though. > Don't forget to add EIGRP and CDP to the list. -sc actually, the one with serious operational impactis inter-router aps. this has never been standardized. hence one can not have a sdh/sonet primary/protect pair coming into a pair of routers each from different vendors. but why is this on a freebsd list? randy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message